What'sNEW
Consensus is deadly for science, says author Steve Benner, a biochemist of the highest rank. He believes the "preponderance of evidence" favored biology from the start; and that chemical results from subsequent landers, Opportunity, Spirit, Phoenix, Perseverance and Curiosity, virtually proved the case for life. The chemistry details sometimes get deep, but the reader will welcome Benner's plain language and familiar examples. And the reader will likely learn some things, as I did. No one has looked at the issues more closely than Benner, I am sure. For an informed, updated analysis of the Viking life-detection experiments, you can't do better. Another thing is even more baffling than NASA's reinterpretation of the life-detection experiments: If results are ambiguous, the obvious course of action is to follow up with experiments designed to remove the ambiguities. That hasn't happened. (What opportunities those rovers missed!) Benner mentions that Gil Levin, principal designer of the "Labelled Release" experiment, suggested a simple "Chiral" version that would certainly distinguish Earth-similar life from sterile chemistry, and do more besides. (If it's life, does it have Earth's chirality, or the mirror opposite? (Levin's collaborator, Richard Hoover, told me the proposal came back from NASA unopened.)) In fact there have been no experiments on Mars to detect extant life there since Viking. NASA has refused to even consider them. Why?! Benner concludes that cultural factors must explain NASA's blindness. His discussion ranges into the history of science, with interesting observations and speculations. But I came away still baffled. Why, for example, would the Opportunity mission director, within only three hours, order the destruction of a tiny fossil that resembled remnants of a crinoid? What's the hurry? Why not stop and look, stop and think? Benner, an insider himself, doesn't mention this episode, but NASA's intransigence clearly troubles him. A talented and imaginative scientist, Benner has thoughts about the origin of life and the RNA World, even considering alternative biochemistries with five or six nucleotides instead of four. He discusses the definitions of life, ways to detect life-as-we-don't-know-it, and crowd-sourcing ideas for low-cost Mars experiments. He stresses the urgency for more robotic missions to seek life on Mars, before humans might forward-contaminate it. This is a very timely, edifying, enjoyable book. Good job, Steve!
An animal snatches useful DNA directly from a completely different organism. ...This 'stolen' gene then underwent epigenetic optimization... with remarkable precision. These words come in commentary about an investigation of a mystery among supergiant isopods: How can they "survive more than five years without a single meal?" The study describes a textbook example of macroevolutionary progress enabled by cross-kingdom gene transfer, nstalled and optimized by operating software within the recipient genome.
A lightning bolt ran through my mind... Immune proteins in human cells could be far more ancient than we'd thought. — Philip Kranzusch, University of California, Berkeley.
The cover story in a new issue of Science reviews new evidence for very old immune-system genes. Many of those genes in eukaryotes appear to have close relatives in bacteria and archaea. "You can imagine early eukaryotes coming along and plucking one from bacteria ...," Aaron Whiteley of the University of Colorado Boulder says. Very old genes acquired by cross-kingdom HGT are surprises for the mainstream theory of evolution; they are consistent with cosmic ancestry.
...radium happened to radiate something that seemed to explode the scientific magazine, bringing thought, for the time, to a standstill — Henry Adams, 1907.
Dear Luis – It was a great pleasure to meet you at the Astrobiology Science Conference in Madison, Wisconsin, 17-21 May 2026. It was fun to see you and my wife laughing about college and discussing your shared admiration for Professor I.B. Cohen. I, too, am interested in the history of science, so I was glad to read your Radium and the Secret of Life. If radium can decay and eventually become another metal, lead, that discovery briefly threatened to revive the old fantasy of alchemy. I was fascinated. But even more interesting, radium seemed to offer a connection between physics and life, and maybe open a path to the origin of life. Your scholarship on that lengthy, complex episode is very impressive — the definitive account of it, I imagine. But let me confess: it reminded me of a more recent moment, when RNA was seen to have catalytic properties. That revelation has exploded into the RNA World, with equally complex narratives to explore, with equal excitement ...still under way. The entrance of quantum theory has had mixed consequences for biology. Yes, the recognition of discrete steps at the most basic level turns out to be a fruitful concept. But the insistence on randomness as the principal driver of mutations (in whatever the material medium was before DNA) has persisted for too long. Luis, I would like to pique your interest in, not just the history of science, but also the philosophy of science, beginning with a principled, Humean skepticism. I think you could make a significant contribution. Please let me know if you have already delved into philosophy, in case I missed it. In any case, I recognize your deep research and excellent writing in Radium. Thank you. Best regards, Brig
So the organics missed by the Viking GCMS experiment, fifty years ago, weren't actually missing. BTW, might the organic macromolecules have been made by ancient biology?
We compiled 9,495 protein coding genes that were identified as horizontally transferred ...from bacteria, fungi, archaea and protists to metazoans.
These words introduce a review of science articles, published between 2000 and 2025, whose titles contained the keywords "Lateral Gene Transfer," "Horizontal Gene Transfer" and "metazoan." The papers and candidate genes were further culled by additional criteria (illustration, right). Most of the transferred genes came from bacteria (red, below).
It was a meticulous, unusual, word-search-based project.
Geobiology is "how Earth and life interact," says Andy Knoll, a founder of the field. His newest offering could serve as a textbook for the subject — there's that much information in it. But it is much more enjoyable than a textbook, because it includes lots of his personal reflections, experiences and interactions with colleagues. One early reader suggested it be published as a memoir.
Knoll begins by discussing the principal elements of life, and how they cycle through our world. Carbon is first, then Nitrogen and Phosphorus. Their "cycles" are complex, interwoven and worth knowing. To follow along, I occasionally got out Theodore Gray's The Elements. You don't have to. His analysis of Oxygen waits until Chapter 8, following his discussion of the origin-of-life. "Where did the first organisms come from?" he sensibly asks. Yet he does not mention panspermia, and the word is not listed in the index. Similarly, in noting that "amino acids have been detected in carbonaceous meteorites and even in interstellar space," he cites this as evidence that they can be made non-biologically. But there is a significant body of evidence suggesting that purported prebiotics in space are actually postbiotic. The ones in chondrites typically carry remnants of life's chirality. Knoll's usual rigor, investigative zeal and open-mindedness seem absent on this subject. Of course, I am presumptuous to criticize anything from a scientist of his stature. One of geobiology's advantages is its applicability to other planets and moons. Knoll is skeptical about life on Mars, okay. But I would love to hear his speculations about Titan, which he says is "perhaps the most interesting body in the solar system, save for Earth itself." It has an atmosphere about as thick as ours, dominated by Nitrogen, like ours, and it has abundant methane. I wonder if a story including life might explain Titan's environment. If geology, mineralogy, Gaia, climate change, ocean chemistry, Mars exploration, plate tectonics, volcanoes, history of life, and history of Earth interest you, you could learn a lot from Andy Knoll, and enjoy doing it. I know I did.
One way to investigate the opening question is to reconstruct the history of evolution with genomic sequences. The nucleotide sequence for a new genetic program should have predecessors. Can they be found? What story do they tell? This approach is rigorously pursued in open-access studies by two internatonal teams scrutinizing the rapid evolution of yeast "point" centromeres. A centromere is the segment of DNA that holds a pair of chromatids together and allows them to be pulled apart for reproduction. This function is unchanged in the course of the studies, so the evolved genetic programming is not overtly "new." Still, the observed genetic rearrangenments deserve attention. Adele Marston provides a helpful introduction to the subject:
One analysis is focussed on the rapid evolution of the point centromeres, while the complex kinetichore machinery that separates the chromatids changed very little. How did the two systems manage to remain compatible? Helsen et al. conclude that different variants of the centromere probably coexist until one is favored by selection.
Another team investigates the path from epigenetic and "proto-point" precursors to point centromeres in yeast. Their introduction concludes, "Comparative and phylogenetic analyses ...show how selfish elements can be co-opted to perform essential chromosomal functions."
The studies observe point mutations, optimization and "progressive" selection, so one might assume that ToE has been convincingly supported. It hasn't. Blocks of DNA have been inserted, deleted and rearranged, all following some logic that accidents don't explain. However, if existing genetic vocabulary is pieced together with genomic software analogous to software used by AI, the rearrangements can make sense.
...thoroughly conscious ignorance... is the prelude to every real advance in science.
James Clerk Maxwell (1831-1879) was as influential as Newton or Einstein, according to The Man who Changed Everything, his biography by Basil Mahon. I first read it for its history of physics. Now I have reread it for its history of science. Polarized light was one of Maxwell's early interests. He employed it to reveal the stresses within transparent models of complex structures (a system still useful today.) His paper about it was poorly written, and he accepted that criticism. Ultimately he developed a style that is "authoritative, but fresh and informal." Occasionally he made algebraic mistakes! He made important contributions to color theory and statistical mechanics, but it was his discovery of the laws of electrodynamics that earned him a place in the pantheon of science — his four simple equations unifying elecricity and magnetism are revered like a sacred text. He had wrestled with the puzzle for years, trying various models, willing to start over if necessary. All the while, he admitted that the true nature of space is unknown, and the apparent dual nature of light would not be easily understood. Throughout his life, Maxwell was fallible, affable and undogmatic, as this biography makes clear. A pleasure to read, it is also instructive, and occasionally evocative. Illustrations include photos of Glenair, Maxwell's longtime Scottish home, in its heyday and, by 1991, in ruins. I recommend this book to everyone. | ||||||||||||||||||||||